What is Abusive Constitutionalism?

Definition

A process where elected leaders use legal and constitutional means to undermine democracy—often by altering the constitution—to weaken checks and balances, entrench their own power, and restrict rights, all while maintaining a facade of legality.
Term popularised by scholars David Landau and later expanded in constitutional law literature.

Core Characteristics

  1. Legal Facade:
    • Changes are made through formal constitutional amendments or judicial interpretations, not coups.
    • Gives the appearance of legitimacy.
  2. Gradual Erosion:
    • Democratic institutions weakened over time (slow decay rather than sudden collapse).
  3. Instrumental Use of Constitution:
    • Constitution becomes a tool for power consolidation, rather than a check on power.

Common Tactics

  • Amending Term Limits: Removing or extending limits to allow leaders to stay in power longer.
  • Restructuring Courts: Packing judiciary with loyal judges; curtailing judicial review powers.
  • Restricting Opposition: Using constitutional changes to limit political competition, control electoral bodies.
  • Curtailing Rights: Narrowing the scope of free speech, press freedom, or assembly under constitutional cover.
  • Federalism Tweaks: Reallocating powers to weaken opposition-controlled states/regions.

Examples

  • Hungary (Viktor Orbán) – constitutional amendments consolidating executive control.
  • Venezuela (Hugo Chávez, Nicolás Maduro) – rewriting constitution to extend presidential terms, weaken checks.
  • Turkey (Recep Tayyip Erdoğan) – constitutional reforms expanding presidential powers.
  • Russia (Vladimir Putin) – amendments enabling extended rule beyond original limits.

Difference from Authoritarian Takeover

  • Authoritarian Takeover: Often involves military coups or extra-constitutional actions.
  • Abusive Constitutionalism: Operates within the legal framework, making it harder to challenge internationally.

Dangers

  • Erodes public trust in the constitution.
  • Makes democratic backsliding harder to detect & resist.
  • Creates “constitutional authoritarianism” masked as democracy.
WhatsApp Group Join Now
Telegram Group Join Now